site logo
ARRS InPractice
  • Latest Issue
  • Contact Us
Homepage > Articles > Imaging Patients with COVID-19: Current Perspective

Imaging Patients with COVID-19: Current Perspective

covid_square

Published March 16, 2021

avatar

Lawrence Goodman

Emeritus Professor of Radiology, Pulmonary Medicine, and Intensive Care Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

    avatar

    Luis Antonio Sosa

    Assistant Professor of Radiology, Section of Cardiothoracic Imaging Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

      In early 2020, as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic spread, numerous articles appeared on imaging for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Descriptions were often discordant and confusing because of small sample sizes and selection biases. Those discrepancies have been largely resolved. As clinical experience and testing improved, imaging’s role has largely switched from diagnosis to aiding prognosis and clinical management.

      Asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients: The Fleischner Society (Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, Vol. 2, No. 3) and others see no role for chest x-ray (CXR) or CT for diagnosis, unless comorbidities exist or testing is otherwise limited.

      Moderately/severely symptomatic patients: CXR is often negative early, only to turn positive subsequently. The most characteristic findings are basilar and peripheral ground-glass opacities (GGOs) (Fig. 1).

      Fig. 1—58-year-old female with no comorbidities and no fever who presented with cough and abdominal pain. COVID-19 severity on chest radiograph was mild. (Image courtesy of authors)

      Unfortunately, only a minority of patients have this typical COVID-19 pattern. In most patients, the disease is located more diffusely or elsewhere. Consolidation may be present initially with more severe illness or duration (Fig. 2).

      Fig. 2—65-year-old man with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease who presented to emergency department after 5 days of cough, dyspnea, and fever (37.8°C) with altered mental status. COVID-19 severity on CT was severe at initial presentation. Patient died 1 day after admission. (Image courtesy of authors)

      Early on, CT may be positive when the CXR is negative. The typical GGO distribution is similar, but usually more extensive than on CXR (Fig. 3).

      Fig. 3—52-year-old female with diabetes mellitus who presented to emergency department with progressive cough and dyspnea, but no fever at admission. COVID-19 severity on chest radiograph, obtained 7 days after positive nucleic acid test results, was mild to moderate. Follow up after 4 months showed complete resolution (Image courtesy of authors)

      Adenopathy, cavitation, and effusion are uncommon early on. Compared to other viral pneumonias, peripheral lower-lobe GGOs are more common in COVID-19, whereas other pneumonias tend to have more diffuse disease. There is considerable overlap, however.

      Reporting guidelines: Many templates have been proposed. Radiological Society of North America guidelines (Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging, Vol. 2, No. 2) define:

      • CXR = negative, COVID-19-like; regular pneumonia, other disease
      • CT = negative, typical of COVID-19; indeterminant, not COVID-19

      Both show moderate interobserver reproducibility.

      Follow-up of established disease: On CXR and CT, GGOs and focal area of consolidation often progress and may evolve into a bilateral acute respiratory distress syndrome-like pattern when cytokine storm develops. Less common CT findings include dilated peripheral pulmonary vessels, adenopathy, rounded infiltrates, and signs of bronchial inflammation. Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia may complicate COVID-19 and vice versa. Preexisting lung disease (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, etc.) further complicate interpretation. Clearing usually starts after 2 weeks.

      COVID-19 may cause hypercoagulability, leading to an increased incidence of both emboli and in situ thrombi and deep vein thrombosis.

      Pleural effusions may appear late, and barotrauma causing pneumothorax appears to be more common than in other viral pneumonias.

      Beyond the thorax: COVID-19 affects more than the lung. It is now clear that this is a systemic disorder affecting many organs.

      As with lung involvement, patients with comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, cardiopulmonary disease, etc.) appear more likely to develop extrapulmonary diseases—summarized briefly below.

      Cardiac disease: A significant minority of patients develop cardiac disease, evidenced by elevated troponins and other cardiac markers. Imaging may show evidence of heart failure, myocarditis, coronary vasculitis, mural thrombi, and pericardial effusions. Cardiac MRI has an important role, since it can identify myocardial inflammation. Myocarditis has been associated with poor outcomes, including cardiac dysfunction and mortality (either related to COVID-19 or other cause).

      Neurological disease: Approximately 15–20% of hospitalized patients develop altered mental status or more focal symptoms. Imaging is positive in a minority, however. Ischemic infarcts are the most common imaging findings, probably related to coagulopathy. Reported infrequently are hemorrhagic stroke, cranial nerve inflammation, encephalopathy, and worsening of multiple sclerosis plaques.

      Renal disease: Elevated renal function tests are not uncommon, and acute renal failure has been reported in some cytokine storm patients. Ultrasound may show increased renal echogenicity.

      Gastrointestinal disease: Diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms are not uncommon. Imaging may show ileus, dilatation, bowel loops (diffuse/focal), and CT may reveal contrast-enhanced bowel wall. Liver function tests are often abnormal, but failure is uncommon.

      Long haulers: A significant minority of patients have residual vague or specific symptoms. Cough and dyspnea are frequent and often clear with supportive therapy within 30 days. Imaging is suggested for symptoms lasting beyond 30 days. Approximately a third of post-hospital patients will have residual signs of “fibrosis” and other residual ground-glass patches. Signs and symptoms in other organ systems may also linger. Clinical and imaging understanding are still evolving and may change as second- and third-wave infections hit, mutations occur, and vaccinations alter immunity. Stay tuned.

      This piece first appeared in ARRS’ SRS Notes.


      The opinions expressed in InPractice magazine are those of the author(s); they do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint or position of the editors, reviewers, or publisher.

      Related

      Previous StoryImaging the Past in Situ: Paleoradiology and the Saqqara Necropolis Excavation
      Next StoryHealth Care Hacking—A System Update

      ARRS

      Contact InPractice
      Meetings
      Articles with Credit
      Books / Books with Credit
      Online Courses
      Web Lectures

      AJR

      AJR Journal
      AJR Articles with Credit
      Subscribe to AJR

      ARRS Membership

      Benefits
      Join / Renew
      Volunteer Opportunities
      In-Training Radiologists
      Senior Radiologists

      Scholarships

      Donate Now
      Roentgen Fund®
      Fellowships / Awards
      Making a Difference

      The American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education activities for physicians. ARRS has been granted Deemed Status by the American Board of Radiology (ABR). Copyright ©, American Roentgen Ray Society, ARRS, All Rights Reserved.